Q & A has become a well-known novel written
by Vikas Swarup as it provides the plot for the Oscar winning movie Slumdog Millionaire. In this article,
we see how the concept of objectivity is traced out in the novel. It is about a
story of a street-boy named Ram Mohammad Thomas, who was able to win one billion
rupees by answering all the twelve questions in the game show called ‘Who Wants
to be A Millionaire?’(W3B) similar to
the Indian reality TV show, ‘Kaun Banega Crorepati’. The boy’s winning not only
surprises everyone but it makes the producers of the show suspicious about his
winning. And so they probe into the case in order to find out how he could
answer all the questions against their script, the objective. Every TV show,
including the so-called reality shows, would have a script to be followed.
These game shows are only a means to increase the TRP rating and earn more revenue
through advertisements. The producers would never intend that someone would win
the whole prize-money and it is same in this TV show too.
However, in the case of Ram the
script fails. No one could find the truth, not even Smita Shah, the lawyer of
the boy, his own boyhood friend who came to help him. Everyone is perplexed
with the absolute right answers of the boy. It seems impossible even for a
well-educated man to have the objective knowledge in all the fields, at least
the different fields that the questions pertain to in the show. Hence it is
incredible that a street-boy is able to answer the questions such as the
sequence of letters inscribed on the Cross or to choose the right meaning of
the term persona non grata in the government
foreign policy or to name the person who invented the revolver or to answer the
right key that Beethoven used in his famous musical piece ‘Hammerklavier Sonta’.
The question that remains here is “how could the boy have objective knowledge?”
Human knowing is not a single
activity. Bernard Lonergan (1904-1984), a Canadian Philosopher, presents the
process of knowing as a structured set of different activities. The process of
knowing contains experience, understanding and judgment that happen in a
cumulative and cyclic manner. The process does not stop here but moves towards
objectivity what is called really real or objectively real. It can be achieved
only by an authentic subject. The criteria for authentic subject are to be
attentive, intelligent, reasonable and responsible. To make it clear Lonergan distinguishes
principal notion of objectivity and constitutive notions of objectivity. He
explains the principal notion of objectivity, the patterned context of
judgments, in this way: “through a true proposition you can arrive at an
objective world.” Lonergan also provides three constitutive notions of
objectivity namely Absolute objectivity, Normative Objectivity and Experiential
Objectivity. Let us discuss about them briefly.
Absolute Objectivity:
Absolute
Objectivity is the knowledge about something which is unconditioned by anything
namely the subject, time and space. “The ground of absolute objectivity is the
virtually unconditioned that is grasped by reflective understanding and posited
in judgment.” A judgment or a proposition is absolutely objective in as much as
its content is absolute. All the answers
given by the boy were unconditioned and were gained through his reflective
understanding on his own experience. For instance, he was able to answer the
question of the meaning of persona non
grata in the government foreign policy, he reflects on his understanding
about the term. Through his experience with a foreign ambassador who was
declared persona non grata and was
sacked due to the guilt of unreliability, Ram gives the meaning “that the
diplomat is not acceptable”. Thus his answer gains Absolute objectivity with
the absolute content.
Normative Objectivity:
This sense
of objectivity is directly opposed to subjectivity. By subjectivity Lonergan
means that of wishful thinking, of rash or excessively cautious judgments, of
allowing factors like joy or sadness, hope or fear, love or detestation to
interfere with the proper cognitional process. “Normative objectivity is
constituted by the immanent exigence of the pure desire in the pursuit of its
unrestricted objective.” Moreover, the
process of cognition that carries inquiry, demand for intelligibility and
demand for unconditioned has ‘norms’ immanently. Therefore, Normative
objectivity is to proceed in the cognitional process with the norms without any
bias. In the case of Ram, the normative objectivity is the script of the
producers which is inherent in the whole show. “Shows like W3B cannot be dictated by chance, by a roll of the dice. They have
to follow a script …. But now this fellow Thomas [Ram] has wrecked all our
plans”, complaints the producer.
Experiential Objectivity:
The third
constitutive element of objectivity is experiential. Any inquiry or insight
presupposes something that is given, the material about which one inquires is given
to experience. Experience is the first stage in the cognitional process in
fulfilling the conditions of the virtually unconditioned. As the object of
cognition is a given reality it is
unquestionable and indubitable in itself. The given is not an answer to any
question and, in fact, it is prior to
questioning and independent of answers. Hence this objectivity is opposed to
what is produced at will. Givenness is extrinsic, outside the agent. While
everyone was suspicious about Ram’s intrinsic knowledge about the answers, in
reality he could find the answers from the facts of his own life-experience,
events and struggles. One such example would be how could an ordinary
street-boy name the smallest plant of the solar system? He learns the name from
his astronomer neighbour. The latter names his cat as Pluto since he deems the
pet as very small. The answer is given to
him in this sense.
Conclusion:
He could
arrive at the objective knowledge through the true propositions, the answers,
which were the result of his authentic subjectivity through attentive,
intelligent, reasonable and responsible process. The novel consists of all the
three constitutive notions of objectivity namely Absolute, Normative and
Experiential which we try to explain in this article.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Pen, Robert. Communication
for Communion: Communication as Mutual Self-Mediation in Context. New
Delhi: Intercultural Publications, 2011.
Swarup, Vikas. Q&A.
London: Black Swan, 2006.
Lonergan, Bernard. “The Apriori and Objectivity.” Understanding and Being. Edited by
Elizabeth A. Morelli and Mark D. Morelli. Toranto: University of Toranto Press,
1995: 156-180.
Lonergan, Bernard. “The Notion of Objectivity.” Insight: A Study of Human Understanding.
Edited by Fredric E. Crowe and Robert M. Doran. Toranto: University of Toranto
Press, 1992: 394-409.
No comments:
Post a Comment